A recent trend in networking is the concurrent use of a single physical network for multiple variants or instances of networks, e.g., IPv4 and some experimental protocol suite, or VLANs. These networks, called Virtual Networks, provide isolation between network instances or types and support shared use of the same infrastructure for different purposes.
Virtual networks attempt to better utilize networking infrastructure by reusing individual routers or links (i.e., either physical or logical networking resource) for multiple concurrent network instances, or to aggregate multiple such resources to obtain increased capabilities. These resources can be any network component, including routers, hosts, links, and services, (e.g., name mapping services). Increased capability can refer to aggregate capacity provided by bundles of links or groups of routers, or increased fault tolerance of a cluster of primary and backup service systems.
Important properties of Virtual Networks (VNs) are
These properties need to be supported down to each physical component, such that each router, host, and link supports concurrence, isolation, and abstraction.
In the network community, “Virtual Networks” is a very broad term, including running multiple wavelengths over a fiber, MPLS, virtual routers, and overlay systems. VN technologies are widely used in parts of the Internet and other IP-based networks, but the community lacks a common understanding of the impact of virtualized networks on IP networking, or how VNs are best utilized. As a result, virtualization has been difficult to integrate across various systems, such as network operators, vendors, service providers and testbed providers (e.g., GENI, FEDERICA, etc).
One current challenge with existing VN systems is the development of incompatible or competing networking techniques in the Internet, causing deployment issues in the future (or even now). For instance, there are numerous ways to virtualize routers and their internal resources (e.g., multiple, isolated routing and forwarding tables) and to virtualize core networks (e.g. MPLS, LISP), but the end host virtualization has not been addressed (e.g., beyond the need for virtual interfaces). Few virtual network systems allow a particular virtual machine in an end host to control its attachment to a specific private network. End host virtualization architecture also determines whether virtualization is per virtual machine, per process, or per connection – and this difference can determine exactly how the end host can participate in VNs. Similar issues arise for virtual services, virtual links, etc.
The VNRG builds on the efforts of a number of IETF WGs, including encapsulated subnets (LISP at layer 3, TRILL at layer 2), subnet virtualization (PPVPN, L3VPN, L2VPN), and aspects of managing virtual components (VRRP), as well as some work in more general areas, notably on tunnels (INTAREA). A side effect of the VNRG is to help place these contributions in a broader context.
The Virtual Networks Research Group (VNRG) will consider the whole system of a VN and not only single components or a limited set of components; we will identify architectural challenges resulting from VNs, addressing network management of VNs, and exploring emerging technological and implementation issues.
Initial set of work items:
The VNRG will initially focus on VNs but at a later stage the VNRG will also be open to related topics, such as system virtualization.
The VNRG provides a forum for interchange of ideas among a group of network researchers with an interest in network virtualization in the context of the Internet and also beyond the current Internet.
The VNRG will encourage the organization of the work in smaller design teams focused on specific areas of research. The design teams will use the general mailing list in order to allow the broader community to follow the evolution of their topics.
Most of the communication inside the VNRG will be done through use of mailing lists, however, the group will hold regular physical meetings at least once a year in conjunction with IETF meetings. Additional meetings may be held at IETF or other venues, such as in conjunction with related conferences and workshops. Related meetings may include research conferences and workshops, such as ACM CONEXT ReArch, IEEE Globecom FutureNet, NSF GENI Engineering Conferences, ACM SIGCOMM VISA; national research efforts, such as NSF’s Find, Japan’s Akari, and the EU’s Trilogy, 4WARD, and Euroview, and related summer schools.
The VNRG will produce Informational and Experimental RFCs in order to document the activity of the group and to formalize the outcome of the research topics carried by the group. In addition, such documentation could become input to IETF working groups. The VNRG will also encourage prototyping of virtual network technologies to validate this exploration.
The VNRG operates in an open fashion (meetings & mailing list).
This Research Group has completed its work and is no longer active.
The charter and other information on this page is provided as a record of history. Email addresses and links may no longer function.
For inquiries about this former Research Group please email email@example.com.
The VNRG concluded its work on 2012-02-08.
The VNRG was chaired by Joe Touch and Martin Stiemerling when it closed.
Additional VNRG information is (or was) available at https://wiki.ietf.org/group/vnrg.