Occasionally, one of the other streams might want to publish an RFC that updates the status of an IRTF RFC. For example, the IETF might develop a standards track version of a protocol previously published as an experimental RFC on the IRTF stream. It is expected that the other stream manager will seek permission to make such a change in status from the IRTF stream manager before asking the RFC Editor to publish such a document. The IRTF stream manager (i.e., the IRTF chair, or their delegate) will consult with the IRSG before responding to such requests. It is expected that IRTF will approve such status changes, unless there a conflict with ongoing IRTF work or some convincing issue is identified.
It’s also possible that an IRTF research group might want to publish an RFC that changes the status of an RFC published by another stream. For example, experimental work might start in the IETF then transition to an IRTF research group, and that group might later want to publish an RFC updating the original IETF experiment. In this case, the IRTF Research Group should document the proposed status change in the headers, Abstract, and Introduction of the proposed RFC. The IRSG and IRTF Chair will review such status change requests as part of the IRTF document approval process. If there is agreement that they are reasonable, the IRTF chair will seek approval from the relevant stream manager. The IRTF Chair will not approve a document for publication prior to receiving approval from the other stream. If such approval is not given the document cannot change the status of the RFC from the other stream.